Results 1 to 15 of 139

Thread: Seagal is at it again

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Hate to Say it...

    But- I believe Seagal in this one. Chicks obviously a major psycho.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,202

    Looking for that Jefferson Parish press conference

    Alleged Sex Victim to Steven Seagal: Save Your Ink, See You in Court
    Today 12:15 PM PDT by Gina Serpe and Lindsay MIller

    Never mind whether Steven Seagal did what alleged would-be sex slave Kayden Nguyen said he did. Seagal's lawyers insist Nguyen had no right to allege it in the first place.

    According to a letter from attorney to the stars and the Out for Justice star's point man, Marty Singer, Nguyen's lawsuit "is in direct violation of the terms of the confidentiality agreement" she signed back in February, when she entered Seagal's employ.

    Read the letter.

    That means, if she chooses to go forth with her unauthorized disclosure of private information (that is, pursue the lawsuit), Seagal's team vows to take her to the cleaners, seeking attorneys fees, costs and sanctions.

    She has 48 hours to comply, but Seagal & Co. shouldn't hold their breath.

    In a letter back to Singer, Nguyen's attorney, William Waldo, wrote the following:

    "I read the letter you e-mailed last night. Please tell Steven Seagal two things. First, the cheap shot threats that might have intimidated other victims and their lawyers don't phase me. Save your ink.

    "Second, Ms. Nguyen's claims are not going away. Five other victims called me yesterday."

    In other words, hold on. It's going to be a bumpy ride.
    I couldn't get the PDF of the letter to download. I gave up on that, but hyperlinked it for y'all anyway.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,202

    From the Sheriff

    So much for Lawman.
    Sex lawsuit halts Steven Seagal reality show
    By Alan Duke, CNN
    April 14, 2010 8:19 p.m. EDT

    Los Angeles, California (CNN) -- A Louisiana sheriff halted production of Steven Seagal's reality TV show because of allegations made against the action movie actor in a sex abuse lawsuit.

    A former model accused Seagal of using her as his "sex toy" after she was hired to be his assistant, a lawsuit filed this week said.

    Seagal's lawyer called the sexual harassment suit "a complete fabrication" and said the woman was fired for using illegal drugs.

    The civil suit put Jefferson Parish Sheriff Newell Normand in an awkward position since the A&E reality series "Steven Seagal: Lawman" is based on his department, where the actor is also a reserve sheriff's deputy.

    "I informed them today that I did not think it would be in our best interest to continue filming at the present time," Normand said Wednesday.

    The sheriff said he has reviewed the lawsuit and he will "take the allegations very seriously."

    "I will treat Mr. Seagal no different than any other employee of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's office," he said. "I am not moved one iota by virtue of his being a movie star of the fact that the national media has an interest in this case."

    Normand, who previously described his relationship with Seagal as "very close," suggested there were questions about the alleged victim.

    "I don't know if these allegations are true," he said. "I mean, as of yesterday, I think there's been revelations about the alleged victim." He did not elaborate on what those questions were.

    Seagal will remain a reserve deputy chief and no criminal probe will be conducted unless the woman makes a statement with sheriff's investigators or the FBI, he said.

    Her lawyer told CNN she did not contact local law enforcement agencies "in light of the fact that he'd been down there all that week shooting the TV show riding in a cop car with them."

    "He is the sheriff's department," attorney William Waldo said.

    Kayden Nguyen, 23, answered an online Craigslist ad for an executive assistant job at Seagal's production company in February and was soon on his private jet taking off from Los Angeles bound for New Orleans, the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court said.

    "As the jet taxied down the runway, Mr. Seagal turned to Ms. Nguyen and said 'I'm a family man, and I live with my wife, but she wouldn't care if you were my lover,' " the suit. "Ms. Nguyen decided to take a wait and see attitude."

    After Nguyen arrived in New Orleans "she learned that the job she was expected to perform had nothing to do with being an 'executive assistant,' " it said.

    Over the next five days, she was sexually assaulted three times by Seagal at a house "many miles from New Orleans in a remote rural area of Jefferson Parish," the suit said.

    Seagal also kept "two young Russian 'attendants' on staff who were available for his sexual needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week," it said.

    During Nguyen's first night on the job, Seagal demanded a "massage," it said.

    "He then proceeded to treat Ms. Nguyen as his sex toy."

    The suit gives graphic details of Seagal's alleged groping and fondling of Nguyen.

    Seagal responded to "Nguyen's terror with the order to 'relax,' 'we won't do anything special tonight. I'll save that for another night,' " the suit said.

    The suit alleged that Seagal and his co-workers with the production company ignored her repeated complaints and the assaults continued, including a "vicious sexual attack" on the second night.

    She finally left the house in a taxi on Sunday, February 28, under the pretense of meeting family members, but against Seagal's wishes, it said.

    "As Ms. Nguyen ran to the cab, Mr. Seagal followed a few steps behind, shining a flashlight with a gun attached to it," it said.

    She was so "in fear for her personal safety that she left behind everything that she owned, including her car keys, her laptop, her clothes and hundreds of dollars worth of makeup," it said.

    The lawsuit said employees of Seagal's production company refused to return her property because she would not sign a release promising not to sue for the sexual assaults.

    As support for the claims, the lawsuit said that Seagal has a "unique physiological reaction to sexual arousal," which Nguyen "can and will describe in great detail.

    Celebrity lawyer Marty Singer, who represents Seagal, said the suit was a "ridiculous and absurd claim by a disgruntled ex-employee who was fired for using illegal narcotics."

    Her claims "are a complete fabrication without a scintilla of truth," he said.

    Nguyen was enrolled in school to be an air traffic controller when she answered the online ad, it said. Before that, she was "an aspiring professional model."
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    new york,ny,U.S.A
    Posts
    3,230
    man idk how i feel about this...they say sex slave, but i think that is the wrong term, a sex slave is just that. there is a reason why seagal isnt being prosecuted and she is just suing him, she was basically a prostitute in a way, she was being paid for her services. and since im not against prostitution im not really angry at this.....however, i think seagal is a total ******* and i believe he would do something like this. i met him once and i really wasnt impressed with this guy and it seems he's always been that way even before he was a celeb...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    new york,ny,U.S.A
    Posts
    3,230
    ok im gonna totally stand by what i wrote above infact im gonna go so far as to say this chick is flat out lying and here is why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XWvNObmOmE&feature=player_embedded#!

    watch the vid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •